15 February 2012

Flood Inquiry Shock: Last-minute challenge to key hydrology report

Brisbane River Flood 2011
Goodna Railway Station 12 January 2011
 looking east towards Gailes
A pivotal hydrology report backing the actions of the four Wivenhoe Dam engineers during last January’s deluge has been challenged in a submission sent to the flood inquiry last weekend.

Brisbane-based DHI Water and Environment Pty Ltd has delivered an 11th hour written submission challenging the report of Sydney-based hydrologist Mark Babister, and which suggests dam engineers were under-qualified.

DHI Australia developed the software model used for hydrology modelling put before the inquiry but now says the modelling was flawed.

“We do not believe the model as developed can be used in a reliable and transparent way to assess the impact of flooding in the Brisbane River,” the firm said in its submission.

“The model has been developed in a way that is not physically realistic and does not correctly represent the river hydraulics of the Brisbane River.”

The firm says the software is not at fault but the manner in which the Brisbane River was presented in the model was.

The submission also said that dam engineers in charge of the floods operations were required by the manual to have experience in hydrology , which it said was not enough.

“The manual should also require that engineers have suitable and extensive experience in hydraulics and applied river hydraulics.”

Radio talkshow host Gary Hardgrave has meanwhile accused two north Queensland councils of refusing to release a report of one of its emergency response workers compiled while working on the Lockyer Valley flood recovery.

The former federal minister said the Cassowary Coast Regional Council and Cairns City Council had not made reports into the Murphy’s Creek, Grantham and Lockyer Valley floods available to the flood inquiry.

15.2.12